Harlem, NY

ECE's Kenneth L. Johnson featured in Crain's NY Article on Diversity Recruiting. 

Kenneth Johnson • June 24, 2020

Can corporations that say they will become more inclusive to Blacks and Latinos 
be believed? - by Gwenn Everett

Even during the current public reckoning around race at top businesses, the old order of corporate New York might be hard to shake, experts warn.

That might be hard to imagine as vaunted companies, including The Wing, ABC and The New York Times , underwent high-profile personnel shakeups amid employee complaints of racial inequity. The biggest corporate names in the city—typically a politically cautious group—have condemned racism in droves and made multimillion-dollar donations to foundations.

Underlying those headlines of change, though, is another reality: Much of corporate New York is still treating diversity the way it has for years. Companies say that's because racial equity was a priority long before protests over George Floyd's killing by Minneapolis police rocked the country. But the companies where leadership changed this month had diversity initiatives in place, too.

Experts say the policies that corporations have enacted so far have produced sluggish progress—even from sectors that are otherwise experts in solving problems.


"We hear every year that this will be the year that companies pay more attention to diversity," said Kenneth Johnson, president of East Coast Executives, a recruitment firm in Harlem. Johnson consults with companies looking to hire more diverse candidates for senior roles.

When it comes to corporate gestures toward diversity, Johnson is wary.

"I've stayed away from kind of buying into those types of statements, because the follow-through has been horrendous," he said. "It's almost been nonexistent.”

Percentage change

It's a puzzling truth given that companies are not shy about setting, and publicizing, diversity goals. Citigroup said in January that 8% of its mid- and upper-level managers would be Black by the end of next year. Goldman Sachs promised last year that a quarter of its analysts and new associates would be Black or Latino hires. Nike, which unveiled new a Midtown headquarters and flagship store in 2017, pledged to hire more underrepresented groups for mid-level management roles in its last Impact Report, which measures diversity in its workforce.

But it's hard to see such corporate pledges as ambitious. Citigroup and Goldman both were aiming to hire a smaller percentage of Black people for their management and entry-level ranks than is in the population as a whole. The United States is about 12.7% Black. Goldman characterized its goal of 25% Black and Latino new associates and analysts as "aspirational," but together those segments make up about 31% of the U.S. population, according to the Census Bureau. Nike has not even set a hard benchmark for its midlevel management hiring.

Part of the issue is that structural forces distort the workforce before firms even begin hiring, said Jerry DeBerry, partner and director of diversity at law firm Mayer Brown, which has a location in Midtown.

"The percentage of Black people going to law school is certainly much lower than the percentage of Black people in the U.S.—significantly lower," DeBerry said. "And we know that as a firm, and as a profession."

The firm, whose associates are 36% people of color or LGBTQ, does outreach at the high school and college level to try to bolster the pipeline of potential Black lawyers.

The outreach has more than tripled the percentage of its partners who are people of color or otherwise diverse, to 16%, DeBerry said. But that's still a couple of percentage points below the industry standard.

"Companies have been engaged in diversity-enhancing practices for decades now. So many of the messages that you're hearing, they're not new," said Sean Rogers, professor of human resources and labor relations at the University of Rhode Island, where he is the business school's chief diversity officer. "The fact that many corporations have been talking about this for decades but we're still seeing problems," he added, "indicates that there is more talk than action."

The past month has shown that representation is not in itself a solution. At ABC News, The New York Times and The Wing, executives stepped down and were placed on leave amid complaints that company culture remained racially insensitive, regardless of the on-paper diversity the firms could boast.

In each case, the executive who stepped down was white and managed a workforce with people of color who complained of insensitivity at best, and toxicity at worst, in their firm's decision-making.

"There's a big difference," DeBerry said, "between being diverse and inclusive."

The New York Times declined to comment. In messages to their staffs, The Wing and ABC News said they were taking the events of recent weeks seriously. ABC launched an investigation into its executive placed on leave. The Wing said it was taking time to reflect.

Companies have not put many people of color into management roles, Johnson said . At Nike, more than one-fifth of its workforce is Black, but only 4.8% of its directors are.

"There's no system in place to sponsor these employees to get them onto leadership paths," Johnson said. "Then they get into a track of job jumping, but it's basically because they never found a job that supported their job journey."

That's not to say that firms have not made any progress. Goldman has met its goal of 25% Black and Latino analysts, and the firm is making progress on associates, spokeswoman Leslie Shribman said.

Consulting firm Accenture has 80 Black managing directors, compared with the 31 it had in 2015, said Jack Azagury, senior managing director and market unit leader for the Northeast.

Accenture, Citigroup, Nike and other companies are publishing data on the diversity of their workforce—which allows for public accountability.

Accenture, which ranked first in a list of 100 firms with strong diversity practices, said it is reworking its efforts in light of the current protests. It said the past month has demonstrated that the firm needs to do more.

"Obviously the past few weeks have been extremely saddening and very tough," Azagury said. "I've sat through in the last weeks probably 12 hours of calls, listening to our employees."

Accenture, which has a location in Manhattan, plans to add racism training to its diversity programming, on top of the unconscious-bias training it already holds.

Firms needs to confront racism head-on, Azagury said.

"Some of it is unconscious bias, and some of it is racism," he said. "And we need to call it what it is."

In September the firm plans to unveil a new goal for Black and Latino representation in its ranks by 2025.

"One of the reasons we are going to set goals for 2025 is we are now accountable. We are now in the public eye. We can hold ourselves accountable," Azagury said. "It's not going to be, 'Let's go at it for a few weeks.' We are in it for the long term."


"I do really believe that some people are sincere about it," Johnson said. "I am cautiously optimistic."

He paused, then said, "Maybe even cautiously pessimistic. We'll be here next year this time, wondering why some of these initiatives didn't work. "


By Kenneth Johnson September 18, 2024
Here is how Kenneth L Johnson & East Coast Executives continues to steady the course...
By Kenneth Johnson July 8, 2024
Unlocking the Future of Talent Acquisition: The Perfect Blend of Technology and Relationship Building
By Kenneth Johnson June 14, 2024
The Impact of AI on Recruitment and Talent Acquisition for Black Job Seekers and Diverse Professionals
By Ted James April 7, 2023
This is a guest post authored by Ted James of tedknowsmoney.com
By Kenneth L. Johnson March 2, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 23, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 16, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 8, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 4, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth Johnson October 11, 2021
5 Surprising Gender Pay Gap Statistics Hiring Managers Need to Know In 2021, women still earn less than men for their work—and according to the statistics below the pay gap is getting worse, partly thanks to the pandemic. Gender discrimination, racial discrimination, the devaluation of a women’s work, and lack of benefits are just a few of the many systematic issues working against women on their path to equal pay in the workplace. These long-standing issues were only exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which set women’s equal pay back even further. Here’s how to better understand the gender pay gap—and five surprising gender pay statistics that all hiring managers need to know. What Is the Gender Pay Gap? The gender pay gap refers to the difference in net pay between women and men. That difference in earnings is calculated in a number of different ways, but the consensus is that women consistently earn less than men, and that gap is wider for women of color and people living intersectional realities, like transgender women or immigrants. What Causes the Gender Pay Gap? It’s important to keep in mind how the wage gap is calculated. It’s calculated to reflect the ratio of earnings for men and women across all industries. Not all calculations are a direct comparison of men and women doing the same work. The way the wage gap is calculated allows experts to take into account multiple factors that influence the gap, including: Differences in Industry When you calculate the holistic pay gap, researchers can better examine how occupational segregation affects the pay gap. Occupational segregation refers to men and women working certain jobs due to gender norms and expectations. Women may tend to work in childcare or healthcare, which tend to pay less, while men might work in manufacturing or IT . That’s why attracting a diverse workforce is so important for your company. Differences in Experience Women carry a disproportionate burden to manage childcare and other unpaid family obligations, and as a result they’re driven out of the workforce. Access to paid family and medical leave makes women more likely to return to work, but not every woman has access to such benefits. Differences in Hours Worked Women may work fewer hours to accommodate for caregiving and family obligations. They’re often more likely than men to work part-time, which means fewer benefits and lower wages. Discrimination and Harrassment Gender-based pay discrimination has been illegal for decades, but unfortunately, it’s still a widespread practice, especially for women of color and people living in intersectional realities. Employers may distribute pay based on previous salary history, which may have been the result of discrimination following women job to job. Much of the reasons behind the gender pay gap revolve around systematic workplace policies that don’t do enough to uplift women and make them feel safe. To fight discrimination, it’s important to have a transparent workplace where women feel as if they can come to managers and HR professionals to speak about issues. Likewise, it’s crucial to have an anonymous whistleblowing system in place to ensure all employees have a secure channel to report issues without fear of reprisal, and sexual harassment training and to help prevent discrimination and harrassment before it happens. 5 Surprising Gender Pay Gap Statistics The global effects of the pandemic have had a serious, damaging effect on women and their road to equality, even with the benefits of remote working . Women earned just 84% of what women earned in 2020, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers. Based on those numbers, women had to work an additional 42 days to earn the same amount as men in 2020. Image Source The pandemic had a huge negative impact on the pay gap. Layoffs and lack of child care made many women leave the workforce entirely. In February 2021, the women’s labor force participation rate was just 55.9% , down from 57.9% the previous year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women of color and those working in lower wage occupations suffered the most. According to The World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report, the gender gap grew by more than 35 years in just 12 months. At this rate, it’ll take 135 years to close the gender gap across the world. The gender pay gap is far worse for women of color. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, Black women with a bachelor’s degree make 65% of what comparable White men do. Education isn’t enough to close the pay gap: Black women with advanced degrees earned just 70% of what White men with the same degrees earned. Women’s gross hourly earnings were, on average, 14.1% lower than those of men in the EU in 2019, according to Eurostat .
More Posts
Share by: