Harlem, NY

Kenneth L. Johnson talks NFL Rooney Rule, Fortune 500 Hiring and Diversity with Forbes

Kenneth Johnson • February 5, 2018

Discrimination is forbidden, as stated by law, but it happens anyway. According to Harvard Business Review , "Hiring discrimination against black Americans hasn't declined in 25 years."

When we think of discrimination, we think of the legal rights of job applicants before they become employees. According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission , Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." But sometimes, discrimination can be masked by favoritism.

This brings me to the recent, high-profile hiring of an NFL coach. It has led some to believe that discrimination is alive and well not only in the boardrooms but on the sidelines of our favorite pastime.

The Rooney Rule is a policy in the NFL that states all teams are required to interview at least one minority candidate for head coaching and senior football operation openings. The independent group tasked with monitoring this policy is The Fritz Pollard Alliance , which advocates for diversity and job equality in the league.

Many speculated that Mark Davis, principal owner of the Oakland Raiders, violated league policy and circumvented the Rooney Rule when he hired Coach John Gruden. According to USA Today , "The Raiders officially hired Gruden as head coach on Jan. 6. But during the introductory news conference, owner Mark Davis said he reached an agreement with Gruden over dinner on Dec. 24. The team hadn’t conducted an interview with any minority candidates at that point."

The Raiders said they interviewed a few minority candidates for the opening, but critics say it only took place after Mr. Davis reached an agreement with Gruden. The NFL has since concluded The Raiders did not violate the Rooney Rule, though The Fritz Pollard alliance disagrees.

John Gruden is viewed by many as football royalty. He checks off all of the boxes as an "A" candidate and is rightfully an excellent hire. As a recruiter, I fully agree with Mr. Davis' decision and his technique in hiring a passive candidate to lead his organization.

On the other hand, as a diversity recruiter and an African-American, I’m disappointed by this situation. Across all sectors and industries, those of us in a position of influence in the recruiting and hiring cycle must adhere to the rules and regulations in place to prevent hiring discrimination. This is accomplished by following the processes in place to the letter of the law in accordance with the rules at hand.

The practice of talent acquisition has been a part of the American workplace for decades, but protecting the rights of workers looking to secure an opportunity remains a challenge in most if not all industries.

When I was 16, I needed some extra cash, and my father, who was an account representative for Mars Inc, had an immediate solution. Over the years, he formed relationships with grocery store managers and owners throughout the Greater Pittsburgh region. He approached one of those managers about a job opportunity for me, his son, who was headed to The University of Maryland and needed a job. I was hired immediately. I’m not even sure I completed an application or had an actual interview. That was business as usual — I had a connect.

My point is, at its core, hiring is discrimination. Whether a hiring manager is looking for the right fit in terms of workplace culture, skill set, personality, education or if the candidate is a referral, it’s all a form of discrimination against those who don’t have whatever it is that is most desired by the hiring decision maker.

In the case of the Oakland Raiders and Mr. Davis, it was familiarity. People make hiring decisions based on a series of variables that are often not listed in the position description, even though there are EEOC safeguards in place to prevent unfair hiring practices by law. Just like the Rooney Rule, it's designed to provide all candidates (regardless of color) the opportunity to be considered.

The laws were originally put in place to prevent unfair hiring practices, but now they must serve simply as the foundation for true equal opportunity. Diversity should be the desire, not the requirement.

If organizations were to have open conversations both internally and externally about the lack of diversity in their current workforce and existing recruitment pipelines, I believe we would experience great strides in the number of minorities in board-level and C-Suite positions. There tends to be a follow-the-status-quo attitude when it comes to the diversification of the workplace, especially and most importantly at the highest levels.

Though the answer may not be the same for each and every company, if it's true that hiring discrimination against black Americans hasn't declined in 25 years and that there will soon be just three black Fortune 500 CEOs , these conversations are long overdue. The future of our workplace depends on change. Companies that see through this change with a sense of urgency and commitment will be the ones that serve their customers best and subsequently win the race for top talent.

We can all learn from the NFL's Rooney Rule. Since its inception in 2003, there has been a definite uptick in the number of minority coaches in the sport, and several minorities have taken advantage of the opportunity to interview for and secure key roles. Now, let's see if the leaders of Fortune 500 organizations decide that equal opportunity at the highest levels serves as a good game plan for them.

By Kenneth Johnson September 18, 2024
Here is how Kenneth L Johnson & East Coast Executives continues to steady the course...
By Kenneth Johnson July 8, 2024
Unlocking the Future of Talent Acquisition: The Perfect Blend of Technology and Relationship Building
By Kenneth Johnson June 14, 2024
The Impact of AI on Recruitment and Talent Acquisition for Black Job Seekers and Diverse Professionals
By Ted James April 7, 2023
This is a guest post authored by Ted James of tedknowsmoney.com
By Kenneth L. Johnson March 2, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 23, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 16, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 8, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth L. Johnson February 4, 2023
Career advice from the world's top Diversity Recruiter & Developer of blkbox.tech
By Kenneth Johnson October 11, 2021
5 Surprising Gender Pay Gap Statistics Hiring Managers Need to Know In 2021, women still earn less than men for their work—and according to the statistics below the pay gap is getting worse, partly thanks to the pandemic. Gender discrimination, racial discrimination, the devaluation of a women’s work, and lack of benefits are just a few of the many systematic issues working against women on their path to equal pay in the workplace. These long-standing issues were only exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which set women’s equal pay back even further. Here’s how to better understand the gender pay gap—and five surprising gender pay statistics that all hiring managers need to know. What Is the Gender Pay Gap? The gender pay gap refers to the difference in net pay between women and men. That difference in earnings is calculated in a number of different ways, but the consensus is that women consistently earn less than men, and that gap is wider for women of color and people living intersectional realities, like transgender women or immigrants. What Causes the Gender Pay Gap? It’s important to keep in mind how the wage gap is calculated. It’s calculated to reflect the ratio of earnings for men and women across all industries. Not all calculations are a direct comparison of men and women doing the same work. The way the wage gap is calculated allows experts to take into account multiple factors that influence the gap, including: Differences in Industry When you calculate the holistic pay gap, researchers can better examine how occupational segregation affects the pay gap. Occupational segregation refers to men and women working certain jobs due to gender norms and expectations. Women may tend to work in childcare or healthcare, which tend to pay less, while men might work in manufacturing or IT . That’s why attracting a diverse workforce is so important for your company. Differences in Experience Women carry a disproportionate burden to manage childcare and other unpaid family obligations, and as a result they’re driven out of the workforce. Access to paid family and medical leave makes women more likely to return to work, but not every woman has access to such benefits. Differences in Hours Worked Women may work fewer hours to accommodate for caregiving and family obligations. They’re often more likely than men to work part-time, which means fewer benefits and lower wages. Discrimination and Harrassment Gender-based pay discrimination has been illegal for decades, but unfortunately, it’s still a widespread practice, especially for women of color and people living in intersectional realities. Employers may distribute pay based on previous salary history, which may have been the result of discrimination following women job to job. Much of the reasons behind the gender pay gap revolve around systematic workplace policies that don’t do enough to uplift women and make them feel safe. To fight discrimination, it’s important to have a transparent workplace where women feel as if they can come to managers and HR professionals to speak about issues. Likewise, it’s crucial to have an anonymous whistleblowing system in place to ensure all employees have a secure channel to report issues without fear of reprisal, and sexual harassment training and to help prevent discrimination and harrassment before it happens. 5 Surprising Gender Pay Gap Statistics The global effects of the pandemic have had a serious, damaging effect on women and their road to equality, even with the benefits of remote working . Women earned just 84% of what women earned in 2020, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers. Based on those numbers, women had to work an additional 42 days to earn the same amount as men in 2020. Image Source The pandemic had a huge negative impact on the pay gap. Layoffs and lack of child care made many women leave the workforce entirely. In February 2021, the women’s labor force participation rate was just 55.9% , down from 57.9% the previous year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women of color and those working in lower wage occupations suffered the most. According to The World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report, the gender gap grew by more than 35 years in just 12 months. At this rate, it’ll take 135 years to close the gender gap across the world. The gender pay gap is far worse for women of color. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, Black women with a bachelor’s degree make 65% of what comparable White men do. Education isn’t enough to close the pay gap: Black women with advanced degrees earned just 70% of what White men with the same degrees earned. Women’s gross hourly earnings were, on average, 14.1% lower than those of men in the EU in 2019, according to Eurostat .
More Posts
Share by: